Month: May 2022

The boys discuss woke efforts to get rid of “man” as the description of the species, and the narcissism of pronouns.

The boys drink and review Sweetwater’s Glacial India Pale Cold Ale, then discuss the man of the week, pronouns, and other gender confusions.

A regular listener objected to “man” of the week. The boys discuss.

Do we have to change “fireman” to “fireperson”? What is the point here?

And how does this relate to pronouns and other “gender” issues of the day?

Some people think it’s “inclusive” to say “he or she,” or other silliness. The boys discuss that at length.

The sunshine state is an odd mix of wonderful and redneck.

The boys drink and review a homebrew dry hop experiment, then discuss Florida. Both of the boys have spent some time there, but Crowhill has spent about a year there, off and on.

The state is quite a mixed bag. It’s the vacation capital of the world, but it has some unique issues.

One thing you quickly notice is that it’s filled with lizards: anoles, iguanas and alligators. They’re usually not a problem, but they’re omnipresent.

While you expect Florida to be a paradise of bikinis and sand, there are a lot of people wearing bikinis who probably shouldn’t.

And it’s a touch too casual. C’mon, people. Can we please wear some decent clothes to dinner?

Then there’s “Florida man.”

P&C discuss these and other topics about the Sunshine State.

Where did this crazy town come from and how did it develop?

P&C drink and review a homebrew IPA, then discuss this weird place in the middle of the desert. How did a town founded by the Mormons becomes known for gambling? Why did a city spring up in that location? How did it develop? How did it take on some of its unique characteristics? Why did it get associated with prostitution, easy marriage, and divorce?

Along with special guest Longinus, the boys discuss the history and development of this strange town, and how it became the city we have today. Why did it shift from a western town with cowboy themes to more of a Miami-like, resort feel? And when did the mob get involved?

In another edition of P&C’s “shortcut to the classics,” the boys review a classic moral tale

Along with special guest Longinus, the boys drink and review Pigweed’s homebrew clone of Steady Eddy IPA, then discuss Melville’s last major work.

The story of Billy Budd is carefully crafted to create a tale of moral confusion and conflict. Set after the French revolution, and very shortly after two significant mutinies in the British fleet, the innocent Billy has run afoul of the law on a British warship. His case cries out for leniency, but it’s not a time for leniency.

The story makes you believe Melville was struggling with the conflict between justice and mercy.

This is a short, dense work, that’s well worth your attention.

It’s as if people are vying to be more of a victim than others. Is that a sound political base?

P&C drink and review BMore Sour from Oliver Brewing, then discuss the intersectional coalition.

“Intersectionality” is the complex cumulative way in which multiple forms of discrimination combine or intersect. It seems to turn “being a victim” on its head. People vie to have more victim boxes to check so they can be more oppressed and therefore — in a peculiar way — have more power.

Along with these categories is the assumption that people who check the same boxes have the same lived experiences and therefore the same opinions.

The Democratic Party seems to have abandoned its traditional base and has adopted something like this intersectional coalition as its new foudnation. Will it work? Does this intersectional coalition have enough in common to stay together?

When did juries start, and what is their function?

The boys drink and review Negra Modelo for Cinco de Mayo, then discuss the jury system.

Pigweed was recently called to jury duty, and the boys discuss the history and development of the jury system and some of the interesting details about it.

What does a “jury of peers” mean? How are juries selected?

The main purpose of a jury is protection against arbitrary government power. Is it doing that effectively?

What is jury nullification, and is it a good thing or not?

What should we do when a jury is under public pressure to reach a pre-determined verdict? Should we replace citizen juries with professional juries?

Cringe comedy, earring boy, anti-intellectualism, Lee Greenwood, and mandatory breathalyzers in cars

P&C drink and review a strong ale from Lagunitas, then do five topics in five minutes each.

1. Do you like cringe comedy? Do you feel embarrassed when someone else is doing something embarrassing? Do you like that sort of comedy? Does that say anything about you?

2. Earring boy. Are we allowed to think less of someone if they dress like an idiot? At some point, “being me” is no excuse — unless you can work in some gender fluidity thing. Then all bets are off.

3. Anti-intellectualism. The boys discuss three possible definitions. (1) You never study anything in any depth. (2) You’re not interested in so-called intellectual things. (3) You’re skeptical of elite intellectuals.

4. Lee Greenwood and his patriotic song. What’s with the “at least” part? It seems to take away from the positive tone of the song.

5. Snuck into the “infrastructure” bill is a proposal to make breathalyzers required on all new cars. Isn’t this assuming guilt? And what does it have to do with infrastructure?

The right rejoices while the left melts down. What’s all the fuss about?

The boys drink a whiskey sour, then discuss the implications of Elon Musk’s purchase of the social media platform Twitter.

Musk claims that he wants to create an inclusive arena for free speech. This has caused the left to melt down.

I thought the left liked free speech.

Part of the problem is the lack of transparency. Twitter has some hidden algorithm that promotes, demotes or even bans certain content. Is it fair? Is it slanted to the left or the right?

Twitter has become a dumpster fire, and many conservatives believe it is biased against them. Is it? Will Elon make it better or worse?

Has the left’s reaction simply confirmed everything the right has said about Twitter all along?