Category: Uncategorized

The boys drink a “Patuxent Walnut,” then discuss three recent news items.

Pelosi goes to Taiwan. It was a ballsy move on her part. China stomped around, red-faced and furious, and threatened to shoot down her plane. But she went anyway. Was that right, or will she be the match that starts WW3?

P&C discuss the U.S.-Taiwan relationship in general, and tie it in with Pelosi’s visit and Biden’s recent bumbles about the U.S. defending the island against Chinese aggression.

Griner goes to jail. The 6’9″ basketball star went to Russia with a small amount of marijuana, gets arrested, and has become a pawn in “prison exchange” negotiations.

She’s not the only U.S. citizen who’s been arrested in Russia for drug possession. Mark Fogel, a former U.S. embassy official, was arrested for possession of 17 grams of marijuana — for which he had a prescription! But nobody says much about Fogel because he doesn’t have star privilege.

The FBI goes to Mar-a-Lago. On its face, this looks like Banana Republic behavior, where law enforcement is used against political enemies. But on the other hand, do we really trust Trump to do the right thing with classified documents, or to tell the truth about it after the fact?

Raiding a former president’s and potential future candidate’s home is unprecedented, and the FBI should have done far more to make sure this was all above the board. They did not, and the FBI has a huge black eye as a result.

The boys drink and review Old Pro from Union Brewing, then discuss narcissism.

Narcissus was an unfortunate fellow who fell in love with his own image, and lent his name to everyone who is a little too obsessed with themself.

Researchers say we have a narcissism epidemic. What’s causing it? A lack of meaning in life? Decline in religion? Social media? Smart phones?

We’ve created a culture where it’s expected that other people have to bow to and accommodate our personal preferences. “You must refer to me this way.” Really?

We no longer believe in status based on merit. We have a generation of kids who got trophies for participating, who were told that the world revolved around them — irrespective of their own accomplishments.

The boys drink and review Low Pitch Hazy IPA from Hi-Wire Brewing, then discuss the morality of suicide, euthanasia, doctor-assisted suicide, and related issues.

It’s illegal to kill yourself, and most religious traditions say it’s immoral. That view is increasingly challenged these days. There are lots of movements for “death with dignity” and similar concepts.

We have a natural revulsion to suicide, but sometimes it’s hard to come up with clear arguments for why it’s wrong, especially in very hard cases. And there are some cultures where suicide is an accepted part of life.

Modern people often believe that something can’t be wrong if it doesn’t hurt other people. How does a suicide harm other people? The boys discuss.

In honor cultures, suicide can be an honorable act where you take the shame away from your family.

Some people face the prospect of unending suffering, with no hope of recovery. Is it right to tell them they can’t end it?

The boys drink and review Double High-Pitch IPA from Hi-Wire Brewing, then discuss the invasion of Ukraine.

Pigweed gives a little historical background on the relationship between Ukraine and Russia, then P&C go through the four possible explanations of the situation recently offered by Jordan Peterson.

1. Putin is an evil expansionist thug who wants to expand his territory and restore the old Soviet Union.

2. [Following John Mearsheimer] The West has been provoking Putin by inviting all of Russia’s border states into NATO and the EU.

3. Russia’s concerned about the stability of its petrochemical-based economy and needs to secure bordering countries.

4. Russia is more serious about Christendom than the West is, and wants to save Ukraine from the decadent, anti-Christian West.

Each of these explanations might have a piece of the truth.

Also, how did the United States get drawn into this? It was understood — just a short time ago — that Ukraine was a horribly corrupt oligarchy, and we didn’t particularly care about it. Now we defend Ukraine as if we’re defending “democracy.”

There’s also a video version of the show.

The boys drink and review two awful beers from Heavy Seas, then discuss gay parenting in general, with a particular emphasis on the recent discussion on the topic between Jordan Peterson and Dave Rubin.

Jordan Peterson regularly encourages people to take on more responsibility in their lives, including getting married and having children. Dr. Peterson’s lectures had an impact on Dave Rubin, a gay man, who wondered, “what about me? How do I fit in?”

Peterson and Rubin talk about all the adjustments Rubin had to make to try to make this apply to his life with his gay partner. Does it even work? Can all the normal paths and expectations in heterosexual relationships and marriage simply transfer over to a gay relationship?

If meaning and purpose in life are so closely tied to marriage and children, how does this work for homosexuals? And should it?

Is it right to subject children to this experiment so that gay parents can feel self-actualized?

(What were the awful beers? Pina Colada IPA and Strawberry Banana IPA. They tasted fake.)

P&C drink and review a homebrewed mild ale, then discuss recent disturbing revelations about psychiatry, and a very disturbing finding in the area of Alzheimer’s research.

An analysis of multiple studies shows there’s little evidence that depression is caused by a “chemical imbalance” — which is what we’ve been told for decades. It’s “common knowledge” that depression is from low serotonin, right? Well … maybe not. And experts in the field have known this for years, but psychiatrists have continued to prescribe drugs based on this apparently false theory.

One in eight people in America is taking anti-depressants, and it might all be a waste of time!

Have psychiatrists been engaged in a “noble lie” to help their patients?

Also, are drugs displacing therapy that might actually help people? It’s hard to help someone lose weight, exercise, eat well, get more sleep, fix their bad relationships, come up with some sense of meaning and purpose in their lives, etc. It’s easy to hand out pills.

Who wins here? The pharmaceutical industry. Are pharma industry profits what’s driving “the science” — on the backs of depressed people?

Also, is depression an aberration, or is depression the default state?

What if psychedelic mushrooms do more for depression than the pills we get from SSRI drugs?

Shortly after this serotonin story there was another story about outright fraud that has set back Alzheimer’s research at least 10 years.

How does this relate to our overall confidence in “settled science”?

P&C drink and review a homebrewed India Pale Ale, then discuss the recent SCOTUS decision on EPA over-reach.

The boys do a quick review of the role of administrative agencies and their authority to regulate, and how that relates to Congressional authority to control things through legislation.

Then they look at the specific issues relating to EPA’s Clean Power Plan, where they forced coal-burning plants to reduce their emissions to levels based on a switch to natural gas.

This case illustrates a big difference between the political left and the right.

The left doesn’t care as much about legal authority if they agree with the goal. They also love to push the idea of a crisis, because when you’re in a crisis, legal authority and procedures don’t matter as much.

The right puts more of an emphasis on restraints on power and respect for legitimate authority. They don’t want government by crisis.

Along with special guest Longinus, P&C drink and review an IPA from the Guinness Open Gate Brewery, then discuss spiritual guru and cult leader Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh.

Rajneesh started off life as a troublemaker — as both a student and a teacher — but eventually found his groove with his own system of meditation, blending eastern mystic ideas with western psychology. He settled into a life of teaching and became fairly popular. He set up an Ashram in India and gathered a pretty decent following, but (fleeing tax problems) decided to move to Oregon to create a new community.

They bought a huge ranch and created an incredible compound, but neglected to consult the zoning laws and ran into trouble with the county and the local town.

Coming shortly after the Jim Jones disaster, people were worried about these glassy-eyed intruders and their strange ways.

Bhagwan and his followers essentially went to war with the local town, and the vision of the utopian community fell apart.

Pigweed and Crowhill, with special guest Longinus, drink and review a coffee stout from Guinness, then continue their “shortcut to the classics” series with a review of Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland.

They start off with a whirlwind tour of the story, then discuss various potential meanings and interpretations.

Generally speaking, the boys are not impressed, and they wonder why in the world this has become such a classic. It is the third most quoted book in the English language!

It’s silly and playful, but is that all? Are there any hidden meanings? Is there an underlying theme? What’s the appeal of this strange book?

The boys drink and review Hi-Pitch Mosaic IPA from Hi-Wire Brewing, then discuss tools, machines, and robots, and how they affect labor and employment.

The Luddites were people who objected to modern equipment that robbed them of their livelihood. But that process of increasing efficiency and reducing labor costs has been a major driver of wealth and opportunity. The industrial revolution destroyed some jobs, but created many more.

But does that always happen? Does automation always result in more opportunity? Or is there an inflection point at which it’s a net negative?

This is a very serious issue for our culture as artificial intelligence and robotics continue to replace more and more jobs. And it’s only going to get worse.

What’s the solution? And who’s thinking about it?

Some people recommend Universal Basic Income, but does that really work?

P&C drink and review “Bed of Nails” brown ale by Hi-Wire Brewing, then discuss recent decisions on the free exercise of religion.

Two important cases came down this term: Kennedy v. Bremerton involved the coach who prayed on the 50-yard line, while Carson v. Makin had to do with a restriction on public money being used to support a religious school.

Kennedy was a football coach at a government school in Washington. As a government employee, did his prayers constitute “the government” endorsing religion? Or, as a private citizen, did he have the right to free speech and free exercise?

In Maine, the government decided to give parents money to send their children to secondary schools but forbade them from using that money in a religious school. The court held that was straightforward discrimination on the basis of religion.

The boys discuss these cases and the broader question of government entanglement in religion.

The boys drink and review Pigweed’s latest version of a sour beer, then discuss Bronies. That is, adult men who are obsessed with My Little Pony.

My Little Pony is a show for little girls. It’s about “the magic of friendship.” And, as a show for little girls, it’s perfectly fine, as far as we can tell.

But how do you react to a grown man who becomes a fanboy for such a show? A man who buys MLP merchandise, goes to MLP conventions, sings MLP songs, dresses up in MLP costumes, and creates MLP art?

The boys are not pleased. Our culture should push men towards adulthood, responsibility, and “putting away childish things.” This is not a good look.

P&C drink and review a Tangerine Wheat Beer from Flying Dog, then discuss recent gun-related news.

Justice Thomas recently wrote a majority SCOTUS decision overthrowing very restrictive gun laws in New York. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” means what it says.

The boys review the decision’s logic and implications. What does “keep and bear” mean? Who has this right? Is it for individual self-defense, or only in the service of a state militia? How will it affect laws in other states?

Does this mean citizens can own anti-aircraft artillery and battleships? Is there a limit to the arms citizens can keep and bear?

Right around the same time SCOTUS issued this decision affirming gun rights, the Senate passed legislation approving so-called “red flag laws.” The boys aren’t fans.

The boys drink and review 1623 Brewing’s Everything But the Seeds, then discuss the strange phenomenon of WeWork.

The founders wanted to create an exciting new work environment where people would collaborate and help one another with their business. They had a particular focus on start-ups, and it seems to have majored in young people.

Adam Neumann was the charismatic leader who wrapped the whole enterprise in a sense of meaning and purpose.

WeWork took off like a rocket with its dramatic investments and enthusiastic, cult-like community.

WeWork expanded into WeLive and WeGrow. The company wanted to change the way people live, work and educate their children.

After amazing growth, investors eventually found out it was mostly hype.

There was way too much to cover on the Dobbs decision than the boys could cover in part 1. In this episode, they skip the beer review and fill in some of the important points they missed in part one.

They discuss the history of Roe v. Wade, stare decisis, and respect for precedent. They review the attempts at gaslighting by the government and the media about the threat of right-wing violence.

Also, will the Dobbs decision affect other decisions that rely on a similar reading of “substantive due process”? Dobbs explicitly says no, but Justice Thomas says they should review those cases, and the dissent says it’s the logical conclusion. P&C agree.

After Dobbs, is there a “right to privacy” in the constitution? Should there be? And is a general “right to privacy” distinguishable from a right to an abortion?

We keep hearing about “domestic terrorists,” and whether one or the other side of our political debates is more dangerous. It seems rather clear on this one. The threats and violence have come from the left.